Back to Archives

Austin Property Value Disputes

Wednesday, November 15, 1961 special called
  • Property Tax Appeals Dominate:

    The meeting primarily addressed numerous appeals from property owners disputing their valuations, citing issues like declining neighborhoods and overassessment.
  • Highway Impact & Valuation Concerns:

    Many appeals highlighted property overvaluation due to the new Interregional Highway's impact, along with concerns about limited access, unusual property shapes, and unfair comparisons to adjacent properties.
  • Zoning vs. Deed Restrictions:

    One significant appeal involved a property legally restricted to residential use but zoned and taxed as commercial, leading to higher valuations and a dispute over fair assessment.
  • Council On-Site Inspections:

    For most appeals, the Mayor announced that the Council would conduct personal site visits to the properties before making final decisions, indicating a hands-on approach.
  • Street Accessibility Issue:

    Beyond tax matters, a brief but notable discussion took place regarding the city's decision not to open East 4th Street at the new Interregional Highway, impacting local connectivity.

Full Transcript

// 1163 CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS Special Meeting November 15, 1961 2:00 P.M. Council Chamber, City Hall The meeting was called to order with Mayor Palmer presiding. Roll call: Present: Absent: Councilmen Armstrong, Shanks, White, Mayor Palmer Councilman Perry Present also: James Wilson, Assistant City Manager; Doren R. Eskew, City Attorney; T. B. Marshall, Tax Assessor and Collector; Members of the Board of Equalization. The Mayor announced this meeting was called for the purpose of hearing tax appeals. WILLIAM P. HOLLOWAY - East 4th, Canadian, Onion and East 5th Streets Full Value Full Value by Tax by Tax Dept. 1960 Dept.1961 Assessed Value by Tax Dept. by Owner Value Rendered Assessed Value Fixed by Board Lots 5 and 6 and the E. 104' of Lot 3, Outlot 8, Musgrove - Canadian St. Land $ 20,734 $ 20,734 $ 15,550 $ 9,000 $ 11,470 Lots 16 and 17, Block 13, Outlot 2, Division 0 1100 block E. 4th Land $ 4,624 $ 4,624 Imps. 1,106 993 $ 3,470 $ 11,620 740 830 $ 2,770 740 Total $ 5,730 $ 5,617 $ 4,210 $ 2,450 $ 3,510 Lots 14 and 15, Block 13, Outlot 2, Division O Land $ 4,624 $ 4,624 $ 3,470 $ 1,620 $ 2,770 1164 1164 - CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS $ 4,018 4,644 WILLIAM P. HOLLOWAY (Continued) Full Value by Tax Dept.1960 Full Value Assessed Value Value by Rendered Tax Dept. by Owner by Tax Dept.1961 Lots 12 and 13, Block 13, Outlot 2, Division O Land $ 4,018 Imps. Total $ 8,662 $ 8,099 1 Lots7, Block 4, Outlot 4, Division A 1400 block E. 5th - Assessed Value Fixed by Board 4,081 $ 3,010 $ 1,400 3,060 $ 3,010 3,480 3,060 $ 6,070 $ 4,880 $ 6,070 Land $ 3,348 $ 3,348 Imps. 1,921 Total $ 5,269 1,921 $ 2,510 $ 1,250 1,440 $ 2,510 1,440 1,440 $ 5,269 $ 3,950 $ 2,690 $ 3,950 Land $ 3,199 E. 43 Ft. of Lot 8, Block 4, Outlot 4, Division A $ 3,199 $ 2,400 $ 1,200 W. 2 Ft. of Lot 8 and all of Lot 9, Block 4, Outlot 4, $ 2,400 Division A Land $ 3,497 $ 3,497 $ 2,620 $ 1,310 $ 2,620 Imps. $ 12,341 $ 11,325 $ 8,490 $ 9,260 $ 8,490 Total $ 15,838 $ 14,822 $ 11,110 $ 10,570 $ 11,110 Lot 10 and the E. 29.05 Ft. of Lot 1l, Block 4, Outlot 4, Division A Land $ 5,505 $ 5,505 $ 4,130 $ 2,070 $ 4,130 Imps. 9,631 8,738 6,550 7,220 Total $ 15,136 $ 14,243 $ 10,680 $ 9,290 6,550 $ 10,680 MR. W. P. HOLLOWAY appeared in his own behalf. He stated the appeal was on the land only. Mr. Holdoway stated the property had been over valued for a number of years and 5 parcels in the area had been sold for less than they were on the tax rolls. Mr. Paul Gladden, Tax Department, stated this was in a general declining neighborhood. Mayor Palmer noted that the Board of Equalization had reduced the value but Mr. Holloway felt it was still too high as the value of this property had gone down since 1957 and they had been hurt by the Interregional Highway. Mr. Harry Pruett, Board of Equalization, stated the property was going down fast; that it had been hurt by the Interregional; and that warehouses were not needed so the Board had given him relief. He stated Mr. Holloway had bought the property under value. Mr. Gladden said the Tax Department had maintained the same value on the property since 1957. Mayor Palmer said the Council would go look at the property. MR. JIM NOVY was present at the meeting and Mayor Palmer enumerated the reasons why the City could not open East 4th Street at the Interregional Highway. He gave Mr. Novy a copy of a memo from Mr. Jim Wilson, Assistant City Manager, dated October 19th. Mr. Novy stated they would be back. _ CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS ROGAN B. GILES - 150 East Riverside Drive 1165 1165 4.317 Acres, Isaac Decker League Full Value by Tax Dept. 1960 Full Value by Tax Dept. 1961 Assessed Value by Tax Dept. Value Rendered by Owner Assessed Value Fixed by Board Land Imps. $ 52,723 9,448 Total $ 62,171 1402 East 382 Street $ 52,723 9,448 $ 39,540 7,090 Not $ 39,540 Rendered 7,090 $ 62,171 $ 46,630 $ 46,630 - .84 Acres, Thomas Hawkins Survey Land $ 5,758 0 $ 14,765 29,312 $ 44,077 $ 11,070 21,980 $ 33,050 Not Rendered $. 11,070 21,980 $ 33,050 Imps. Total $ 5,758 MR. ROGAN GILES appeared in his own behalf and stated he would accept the value placed on the property at 1402 East 382 Street and the appeal was on the land only at 150 Riverside Drive. He said he has this property under lease and is responsible for paying the taxes, the lease beginning in 1960. He stated the back area of this tract was treated the same as the frontage on Riverside; that the property had been filled in and could not be used for a long time; that this back area should be assessed the same as the adjacent property which was assessed lower than his. The Mayor said the Council would look at this property. J. M. ODOM - 6937 Interregional Highway Full Value by Tax Dept.1960 Full Value by Tax Dept. 1961 Assessed Value by Tax Dept. Value Rendered by Owner Land $ 15,467 $ 26,310 $ 19,730 Imps. 115,909 115,909 Total 131,376 142,219 86,930 98,530 4.82 Acres, James P. Wallace Survey Land $ 16,942 $ 22,840 $ 17,130 $ 7,500 $ 17,130 Imps. 0 0 0 0 0 Total $ 16,942 $ 22,840 $ 17,130 $ 7,500 $ 17,130 86,930 106,660 4.02 Acres, James P. Wallace Survey $ 11,600 Assessed Value Fixed by Board $ 19,730 86,930 106,660 MR. CHARLIE MORTON and MR. B. L. SCHWARZBACH represented Mr. Odom. Mr. Morton stated there was no protest on the improvements but that the appeal was on the land only. He submitted a sketch to the Council. Mr. Morton stated because of the extreme depth and shape of the 4.82 acres; no access to the back acreage; and the dedication to a firm lease (Farmers Insurance Building), any development of these entire tracts is very unlikely. They felt a depth of 300 feet east from Interregional Highway would be more than sufficient for the requirements of any possible development and therefore the back acreage should carry little value. Mr. Morton stated Mr. Odom had to install dual septic tanks since there was no sewage service in the area and had participated in extending the water service to this property in 1956. He stated they thought $4,000 an acre back of the 300' mark was out of line with the other property in the vicinity. Mayor Palmer stated the Council would go out and look at the property. 1/1616 CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS 1166 MOTON H. CROCKETT, JR. - Full Value by Tax Dept.1960 Airport Blvd. - Land $ 18,361 5400 Airport Blvd., 5500 Airport Blvd., 833 East 53rd Street, 6108 Cameron Road and State Highway No. 20 Assessed VaValue Value by Full Value by Tax Dept.1961 Rendered Tax Dept. by Owner Assessed Value Fixed by Board .68 Acres, Block 1, Lou Hill Subdivision $ 27,541 $ 20,660 .16 Acres, Block 1, Lou Hill Subdivision $ 6,798 Land $ 4,532 Split Property $ 20,660 $ 5,100 $ 3,400 $ 5,100 MR. JOHN ALLEN represented Mr. Moton H. Crockett, Jr. Mr. Allen stated all of Mr. Crockett's appeals were on land only. Mr. Crockett was present also. Mr. Allen said that in 1953 this property was on the tax roll for $7,586 and since then 1/2 acre had been sold and a portion had been dedicated for street right-of-way and it was on the tax roll now for $34,340 an increase of 60%. Не stated the Tax Department was projecting the value into the future. Mr. Allen stated because of the narrow depth consideration should be given as to what the land could be used for with set-back requirements. Mr. Paul Gladden, Tax Department, explained that a depth factor had been allowed. Mr. Crockett objected to the $75 per front foot value placed on the property. They thought $50 would be more fair, allowing the depth factor in addition. Mr. Crockett asked that the Council keep in mind the substandard houses in the back of this property. Mayor Palmer stated the Council would look at this property. 1.007 Acres of Block 2, Lou Hill Subdivision E. 53 Street Full Value by Tax Dept. 1960 Full Value by Tax Dept. 1961 Assessed Value by Tax Dept. Value Rendered by Owner Land $ 7,877 $ 9,560 $ 12,750 $ 5,910 Assessed Value Fixed by Board $ 9,560 MR. ALLEN stated this property was restricted by Deed Restrictions to "A" Residence but is zoned "C" Commercial and was taxed as commercial property. Councilman Shanks said the property could be rezoned to residential but Mr. Crockett stated he rather that it not be changed. He asked that it be considered as residential as it would not be used as commercial. Mr. Marshall, Tax Assessor and Collector, said it had been considered as commercial as they did not know about the restrictions when it was appraised. The Mayor stated the Council would look at this property. 1167 CITY OF AUSTIN. TEXAS 1167 MOTON H. CROCKETT, JR. (Continued) Full Value Full Value by Tax by Tax Dept. 1960 Dept. 1961 - Assessed Value by Value Rendered Tax Dept. by Owner 16.41 Acres, James P. Wallace Survey Highway 20 Land $ 53,104 Assessed Value Fixed by Board $139,040 $104,280 $ 39,830 $104,280 2.02 Acres of James P. Wallace Survey Land $ 8,150 $ 31,922 $ 23,940 Split Property $ 23,940 MR. ALLEN questioned the influence the sale of 2 acres out of this tract had on the appraisal of this property. He stated this was not the type of sale to influence appraisal of the property as this was a special purpose sale. Mr. Marshall stated the Tax Department had a formula for figuring odd shaped lots but Mr. Allen felt the factor did not allow enough for the narrow depth. He stated 220' of the area was less than 100' in depth and the depth factor was unrealistic. Mr. Marshall said the depth factor had been used for the whole tri- angle. Mr. Allen stated they thought in the future the property would be valuable but the tax was based on sspeculation and they objected to the front foot value. Mr. Crockett stated the valuation had been raised 1000% since 1955; that there was a limit as to how much could be developed for commercial in this vicinity of the city and they asked that this be thought of as unimproved property. Mayor Palmer stated the Council would look at this property. E. J. HOOD -2200 Oldham - Full Value by Tax Dept.1960 Land $ 5,579 Imps. 45,287 Total $50,866 Lot 10-A, Resubdivision of Lots 9 and 10 and part of 8, Block 33, Christian and Fellman Full Value by Tax Assessed. Value by Value Rendered Dept. 1961 Tax Dept. by Owner $ 5,293 43,900 $ 49,193 $ 3,970 $ 4,180 32,930 29,200 $ 36,900 $ 33,380 2321 Oldham Lot 5 and N. 12 Ft. of Lot 4, Block 48, Assessed Value Fixed by Board $ 3,970 32,930 $ 36,900 Christian and Fellman Land $ 5,026 $ 4,714 46,728 $ 51,442 $ 3,540 $ 3,770 $ 3,540 35,050 4,770 35,050 $ 38,590 Imps. 6,355 Total $ 11,381 $ 38,590 $ 8,540 MR. E. J. HOOD appeared in his own behalf. He stated this appeal was on the improvements only. Mr. Hood said he owned three apartment buildings and that the ones located at 2200 and 2202 Oldham had 6 units each and were identical but were assessed differently $36,900 for the one at 2200 Oldham and $31,250 for the one at 2202 Oldham. He stated the income factor was the same as he could not ask more for one apartment than the other when they were identical. The apartment building at 2321 Oldham had 5 units. He felt the different assessments on the buildings could not be justified. Mr. Jack Klitgaard, Tax Department, stated one 1168 _ CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS 1168 of the buildings had a small basement and the airconditioning of one was carried as personal property and the airconditioning of the other was carried as real property. Mayor Palmer stated the Council would go look at this property. $ 67,142 471 $ 67,613 HARRY M. WHITTINGTON - 901 Brazos Land - Lot 1, Block 112, Original City Full Value Full Value by Tax Dept. 1960 $ 53,973 0 Imps. Total $53,973 by Tax Dept.1961 Assessed Value by Tax Dept. Value Rendered Assessed Value Fixed by Owner by Board $ 50,360 350 Not $ 50,360 Rendered 350 $ 50,710 $ 50,710 805 Brazos - Lot 10, Block 96, Original City Land $ 27,577 $ 27,577 $ 20,680 Not Imps. 413,651 402,464 301,850 Rendered Total $441,228 $430,041 $322,530 $ 20,680 301,850 $322,530 S. 78.5 Ft. of Lots ll and 12, Land $ 55,786 $ 83,660 Block 96, Original City $ 62,750 Not $ 62,750 Rendered MR. HARRY WHITTINGTON appeared in his own behalf. He said this appeal was on the land only. He stated he had spent considerable money for the lowering of the property, Brazos and 9th Streets, and had paid for his and the Church's part for the widening of Brazos Street; that the church was permitted to jut out about 4' and because of this the entrance to the Vaughn Building could not be seen from 8th and Brazos; that the terraine on this side of the street was bad; and the traffic becomes congested in this block as it moves north. He stated there had been a 56% increase on the Vaughn Building property and 27% increase on the parking lot. Mr. Whittington asked that he be given some consideration for the expense he had had in excavating and lowering this property. He stated nothing had been done to increase the value of property and that the rent of the office space, in the Vaughn Building had not gone up. considered. Mr. Paul Gladden, Tax Department, property regarding the widening of the street. the reappraisal of the down-town section. The Mayor stated the Council would look at this property. He asked that the bluff factor be explained the reappraisal of the Discussion was held concerning WALTER WUKASCH - 2266-2270 Guadalupe - Full Value Full Value by Tax Dept.1961 by Tax Dept. 1960 Land $ 83,544 Imps. 17,756 Total $101,300 14,866 $136,016 $121,150 N. 20 Ft. of Lot 36, Block 35, Horst Assessed Value by Tax Dept. Value Rendered by Owner $ 90,860 Not 11,150 Rendered $102,010 Assessed Value Fixed by Board $ 90,860 11,150 $102,010 CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS 1469 1169 MR. WILLIAM CARSSOW, Attorney, appeared for the Appelant. Mr. Walter Wukasch and his mother, Mrs. Wukasch, were present also. Mr. Carssow stated this appeal was on a 50' lot at the southwest corner of Guadalupe Street and West 23rd Street, on the land only. He stated the front foot valuation on West 23rd Street had been raised from $300 to $600 while the valuation on West 22nd had been left the same at $300; West 24th had been raised from $200 to $400 and West 25th Street had been raised from $150 to $200. He stated the other streets were better than West 23rd and Mrs. Wukasch objected to this valuation of $600. He asked that any corner influence of this property be taken off, as at this one corner you do not have a corner influence because the cross walk is in the middle of the block at the University Mall. Mr. Carssow also objected to the $1750 per front foot valuation placed on the Guadalupe side stating the property across the street to the north was assessed at $1000. He said the Wukasch's property had been raised $500 per front foot on the Guadalupe side while the University Co-Op and Hemphill's Book Store had been raised only $250 and the resttof the property in this block and the block to the north had been left the same. He compared this property with Hemphill's. He stated the entire area had changed; that there was no place to park; and that the University drag was over rated. Discussion of the benefit of foot traffic was held. Mr. Dell Sheftall, who rents from Mrs. Wukasch, stated the businesses in this area have a summer slump and they have to try to make it in 8 1/2 months; and that he did not think the foot traffic on West 23rd was of any help as it was not normal foot traffic. Mr. Wukasch stated they get the same rentals as they did 13 years ago. Mr. Paul Gladden, Tax Department, stated this had been raised to be put on the same basis as the others. Mr. Carl T. Widen and Mr. Harvey E. Deen, members of the Board of Equalization, stated the Board had studied this very close and they felt it should be the same as Hemphill's and the Co-Op on the Guadalupe Street side but some adjustment should be made on 23rd Street. Mayor Palmer stated the Council would check this. LUMBERMAN'S ASSOCIATION Land - 1200 West 25th Street- Lots 1 through 5, Block 4, Outlot 43, Division D Value Rendered by Owner Full Value by Tax Dept. 1960 Full Value by Tax Dept. 1961 Assessed Value by Tax Dept. $ 31,487 98,577 $130,064 $ 23,620 Not 73,930 Rendered $ 97,550 $ 15,106 Imps. 100,610 Total $115,716 Assessed Value Fixed by Board $ 23,620 73,930 $ 97,550 MR. WILLIAM CARSSOW represented the Lumberman's Association. He stated this property had been assessed at $125 per front foot while the property across the street had been assessed at $75 per front foot. Mr. Harry Pruett, Board of Equalization, stated the Board wanted to review this and come back with a recommendation. The Council referred this back to the Board of Equalization. 1170 CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS 1170 There being no further business, the Council adjourned at 6:00 P.M., subject to the call of the Mayor. ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED Los tis 2. Pas Mayor