=CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS- MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS Regular Meeting November 06, 1975 10:00 Α.Μ. Council Chambers 301 West Second Street The meeting was called to order with Mayor Friedman presiding. Roll Call: Present: Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell Absent: Councilmember Lebermann The Invocation was delivered by REVEREND GLENDON FRANK, Messiah Lutheran Church. VETERAN'S DAY Councilmember Himmelblau read and presented a proclamation to June Bell declaring November 11, 1975, as "Veteran's Day" and called on all residents to observe and participate in the appropriate ceremonies planned by our City's veterans organizations. Mrs. Bell stated that she wouldlike to relinquish the acceptance of the proclamation to Gunnery Sergeant Codrey, representing Captain Walt Jones from the United States Marine Corps, General Chairman of the Veteran's Day activities. Gunnery Sergeant Codrey thanked the Council on behalf of the United States Marine Corps and the Inspector-Instructor Staff in Austin, Texas, and they anticipated an excellent Veteran's Day. On behalf of the United States Marine Corps, Sergeant Codrey presented a memorabilia of the Bicentennial of the United States Marine Corps to Mayor Friedman. Mayor Friedman commented that due to the request of Irvin P. (Sarge) Bell, Mr. Bruce Petty, associated with the Electrical Department, and several City employees, the City Manager and Budget staff were considering reinstating November 11, 1975, Veteran's Day as an official holiday. Sergeant Codrey noted that Councilmember Himmelblau would be participating in the Veteran's Day parade, and in view of this he presented a memorabilia to her also. Councilmember Himmelblau thanked Sergeant Codrey and stated that was a very special day. 1 25 CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXASNovember 6, 1975 1166 Mrs. Bell reviewed the history of Veteran's Day by stating that on November 11, 1918, the armistice was signed ending World War I. The unknown soldier of World War I was buried at Arlington National Cemetery; and that November 11 was proclaimed as Armistice Day in 1926 in recognition of the signing of the armistice ending World War I. In 1938, November 1l became a national holiday and was changed to Veteran's Day in 1954. In 1971, Veteran's Day was moved to the fourth Monday in October due to Federal law. Finally in 1975, the 64th Texas Legislation reverted the date back to November 11 as a state holiday. She noted that by pressure from the veteran's organizations and the military, Veteran's Day would now be on November 11 and for calendar purposes would begin Federal law in 1978. Mrs. Bell thanked Mayor Friedman for his consideration of changing the date. At this time, she recognized her husband, Irvin (Sarge) Bell and other members of the VFW, and stated they would be in charge of the parade this year. In recognition of the Bicentennial, the parade would be a Veteran's salute to America, and Mrs. Bell invited all to attend the parade as well as the memorial services at the Capitol. AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK Mayor Pro Tem Snell read and presented a proclamation to Mr. Charles Akins, Principal of Anderson High School, declaring the week of November 16-22, as "American Education Week" and encouraged all residents to join the Council in observing this week in honor of our children, the professionals who guide our education system, and the individuals who support education in their communities. Mr. Akins accepted the proclamation on behalf of the Austin Public Schools, and felt that Austin had the finest education system in the state. He extended to the Council and citizens of Austin an invitation to visit the public schools during American Education Week. Mr. Akins announced that on Veteran's Day a program would be presented at Anderson High School and invited the Council and citizens to attend. At this time he introduced members of the Student Council at Anderson High School. POPPY DAYS as Councilmember Linn read and presented a proclamation to Mrs. Tim McKelvey, Auxiliary President of the American Legion Auxiliary, and Mrs. Lloyd Freeburn, Poppy Chairman, proclaiming the days of November 6-13, 1975, "Poppy Days" and encouraged the citizens of Austin to wear the Memorial Poppy as a tribute to all veterans of Austin who served in defense of our land and to whom we pay honor on Veteran's Day, November 11, 1975. Mrs. McKelvey stated as president of Unit 83, she would request that her Poppy Chairman, Mrs. Freeburn, accept the proclamation. Also at this time, the two Poppy Girls, Melisa and Holly, distributed poppies to the Council. Mrs. Freeburn, Poppy Chairman, stated that on behalf of the American Legion Auxiliary Unit 83 and the Department of Texas, she expressed their gratitude for proclaiming the time for distribution of poppies. The proceeds from poppy sales would be utilized in helping the Veterans in need, and she was proud that the Council recognized this worthwhile project. Mayor Friedman thanked the Auxiliary. November 6, 1975 1167 - CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS BEVO'S BIRTHDAY WEEKEND Mayor Friedman read and presented a proclamation to David Butts, President of Silver Spurs and Bill Denton, Rodeo Director of Silver Spurs, proclaiming November 7-8-9, 1975, as "Bevo's Birthday Weekend" and urged all residents, including the loyal supporters of the University of Texas, to participate in this traditional celebration and honor the mascot of our great educational institution. The Silver Spurs thanked the Council and urged everyone to attend the Bevo Birthday Rodeo. NATURAL SCIENCE DAY Mayor Friedman read and presented a proclamation to Mrs. Surrenden Angly proclaiming December 13, 1975, as "Natural Science Day" and called on all residents to join the Council in supporting the efforts of the Natural Science Guild and the Natural Science Center. Mrs. Angly thanked the Council, and on behalf of the Natural Science Guild thanked the Council for proclaiming December 13, 1975, as Natural Science Day and invited them to a party that would benefit the pioneer settlement. 1 a PRESENTATION Jane Wells, associated with the State Bar Project, introduced Mr. John Cones, Director of the State Bar COMP Project, Mr. Ray Sample and Mr. Jim McNabb. Mrs. Wells thanked the Council for the opportunity to introduce them to this project entitled "COMP" which is sponsored by the State Bar of Texas. One of the functions of this program would be the development of jobs and the placing of qualified ex-offenders on these jobs. She commented that she was involved with working with employers, and noted that the City of Austin had been leader in the community by their involvement in the program. By the efforts of the Personnel Department the past year, the City has employed in excess of 35 ex-offenders. Mrs. Wells recognized the work of Carolyn Harris of the Personnel Department for her assistance with the ex-offender referrals. The certificate presented to the Council stated certification that the City of Austin was a cooperating member of "YES". She explained that "YES" was a project of the comprehensive offender manpower program of the State Bar of Texas; and by businesses agreeing to hire the ex-offender, "YES" members were aiding in saving the lives, property and tax dollars of Texans. Mrs. Wells presented the certificate to the Council. Mayor Friedman thanked Mrs. Wells for the certificate and the work that was being accomplished by "COMP" in Austin and statewide. He noted that it was through the work of Carolyn Harris in the Personnel Department that had made the award possible; therefore, he wanted Carolyn Harris to receive the proclamation and the award. Carolyn Harris graciously accepted the certificate and considered her role in the placement of ex-offenders as an insignificant one. She appreciated the opportunity to serve the community in a step in advancement. Mrs. Wells commented that they were looking forward to continue working with the City and noted that this was the first certificate issued, and it was awarded to the City of Austin for their outstanding job. November 6, 1975 1168 -CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Linn moved that the Council approve the Minutes of the October 30, 1975, meeting. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Himmelblau, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Linn, Trevino Noes: None Absent: Councilmember Lebermann ZONING HEARINGS Mayor Friedman announced that the Council would hear the zoning cases scheduled for 10:00 a.m. for Public Hearing at this time. Pursuant to published notice thereof, the following zoning applications were publicly heard: J. TIM BROWN, RICHARD BROWN and R. W. ELLMER By William Garwood C14-75-096 6801-7107 South Congress Avenue From Interim "A" Residence 1st Height and Area To "LR" Local Retail (Tract 1) "B" Residence (Tract 2) "BB" Residence (Tract 3) 1st Height and Area RECOMMENDED by the Planning Commission, subject to a restriction of "BB" Residence density on Tract 2 if used for apartments, restriction of 10 units per acre on Tract 3, a privacy fence along the eastern boundaries of Tracts 1 and 2 and a special permit. Mr. Dick Lillie, Director of Planning, reviewed this by stating that the use for the land would be in conformance with zoning which had been granted on the west side of Congress Avenue at this location. The Planning Commission recommended the approval of the application. Councilmember Himmelblau moved that the Council grant "LR" Local Retail District on Tract 1; "B" Residence District on Tract 2; and "BB" Residence District on Tract 3, 1st Height and Area as recommended by the Planning Commission subject to conditions. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Linn, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Noes: Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman None Absent: Councilmember Lebermann The Mayor announced that the change had been granted to "LR" Local Retail District on Tract 1; "B" Residence District on Tract 2; and "BB" Residence District on Tract 3, 1st Height and Area, subject to conditions, and the City Attorney was instructed to draw the necessary ordinance to cover. - November 6, 1975 1169 CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS Councilmember Lebermann entered the Council Chamber at this time. LILLIE BESS HAMILTON By John van Winkle C14-75-097 4100 Marathon Boulevard, also bounded by West 41st Street From "A" Residence To 1st Height and Area "0" Office 1st Height and Area RECOMMENDED by the Planning Commission subject to 5 feet of right-of-way (30 feet from the centerline) on West 41st Street Mr. Lillie noted that the application was located in an area which has been developing from residential to office use. During the public hearing before the Commission, they requested that a site plan be prepared for the Commission's review. This was accomplished and the zoning was recommended by the Commission with the requirement of right-of-way which was acceptable to the applicant. Councilmember Linn moved that the Council grant "0" Office, 1st Height and Area District as recommended by the Planning Commission, subject to conditions. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Trevino, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell Noes: None The Mayor announced thattthe change had been granted to "0" Office, 1st Height and Area District subject to conditions, and the City Attorney was instructed to draw the necessary ordinance to cover. EDWARD JOSEPH, TRUSTEE By Robert C. Sneed C14-75-101 U. S. Highway 183 and Cameron Road From Interim "A" Residence 1st Height and Area To "D" Industrial 1st Height and Area RECOMMENDED by the Planning Commission, subject to restrict- ing the use to that shown on the special permit submitted by the applicant on file with the City of Austin Planning Department Mr. Lillie stated that this application was for industrial zoning for the Eagle Signal Industrial Corporation. The site plan submitted has been reviewed by all departments and has been recommended. The Planning Commission reviewed the location and site plan and felt the zoning was appropriate with the site plan attached. A letter has been filed by the applicant which would tie the site plan to the zoning. Application has been recommended by the Planning Commission with the site plan attached. (Ordinance passed later in the meeting) November 6, 1975 1170 =CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS Councilmember Linn moved that the Council grant "D" Industrial, 1st Height and Area District, as recommended by the Planning Commission, subject to conditions. The motion, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Snell, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmember Himmelblau Noes: None The Mayor announced that the change had been granted to "D" Industrial, 1st Height and Area District, subject to conditions, and the City Attorney was instructed to draw the necessary ordinance to cover. --------- EDWARD R. RATHGEBER, JR., DR. ED PETRUS and JESSIE B. ANDERSON C14-75-098 Northwest corner of William Cannon Drive and Emerald Forest Drive From Interim "A" Residence 1st Height and Area To "0" Office 1st Height and Area RECOMMENDED by the Planning Commission Mr. Lillie pointed out that the application would be for an office project. The special permit has been approved by the Planning Commission and the zoning was in conformance with the special permit. This has been recommended by the Planning Commission. Councilmember Hofmann moved that the Council grant tot Office, 1st Height and Area District as recommended by the Planning Commission. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Trevino, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Lebermann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann Noes: None The Mayor announced that the change had been granted to "0" Office, 1st Height and Area District, and the City Attorney was instructed to draw the necessary ordinance to cover. CAT MOUNTAIN PROPERTIES By Jeryl D. Hart C14-74-005 Lookout Mountain Drive and F.M. 2222 From "A" Residence 1st Height and Area To a Planned Unit Development, 380 attached and detached single-family dwelling units with common open space and amenities called, "Cat Mountain Villas". Mr. Lillie noted that the application had been approved by the Planning Commission and reviewed by all the departments. All the conditions pertaining to a planned unit development have been met. _ CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS November 6, 1975 1171 ROY BECHTOL, architect representing the applicant, commented that a detailed presentation had not been prepared because the project had been under construction for about 1-1/2 years. It was approved by the Planning Commission and the Zoning Committee. In response to Councilmember Linn's question, Mr. Lillie stated that the project was approved while it was outside the City limits. He pointed out that the process concerning planned unit developments.was amended to include that all planned unit developments outside the City limits would have to be approved by the Council after the Planning Commission has approved them. The density of the project would be 3.09 units per acre, and Mr. Bechtol commented that it would be a totally residential Planned Unit Development. 36% of the site would be preserved as a natural greenbelt and the building coverage would be approximately 40%. He indicated that numerous people were at the Planning Commission and Zoning Committee hearings to hear the project discussed. Mr. Bechtol noted that there wouldnot be any commercial entities within the project. There was some concern about the area adjacent to some of the residents homes, and he pointed out they had been very cautious to develop the project so it would be compatible with the surrounding land use. MR. BARTCLIFF, a resident in the area, asked if the project would increase the number of people, and Mr. Bechtol stated that the density would be the same as stated in the preliminary plan of 3.1 units per acre with a maximum being 3.09. Mr. Bartcliff commented that he would desire to meet with Mr. Bechtol concerning the project. Councilmember Hofmann felt that since it had been approved, she felt the Council should move the approval of the project. Councilmember Hofmann moved that the Council grant a Planned Unit Development, as recommended by the Planning Commission. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Himmelblau, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Linn, Lebermann, Trevino Noes: None The Mayor announced that the change had been granted to a Planned Unit Development, and the City Attorney was instructed to draw the necessary ordinance to cover. ZONINGS CONTINUED C. DARRELL HOPKINS and ASSOCIATES, INC. By James M. Steed 9130 Jollyville Road (Old U. S. 183) C14-75-095 From "A" Residence 1st Height and Area Το "GR" General Retail 1st Height and Area NOT REcommended RECOMMENDED by the Planning Commission "GR" General Retail 1st Height and Area and "B" Residence 1st Height and Area on the back 25' as a buffer- protection (continued) C. DARRELL HOPKINS and ASSOCIATES, INC. (continued) _ CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS November 6, 1975 1172 to be left in its natural state, subject to a six-foot privacy fence where adjacent to "A" Residence zoning and a limitation to a one-story structure. Mr. Lillie commented that on the land adjacent to the property there was a strip of "B" Residence left along the property line adjacent to the residential lots within the subdivision. The residential "B" Residence District was to prohibit the location of commercial buildings adjacent to the property line; and at the time that zoning was approved felt that the "B" Residence could be used for parking but not for building. Since the zoning has been approved, the Building Inspection Department has stated that "B" Residence cannot be used for parking. It would require an "0" Office zoning. This application recommends the "GR" General Retail zoning back to the 25' strip of "B" Residence, and continue the "B" Residence zoning recommendation and leave it as a natural buffer. It cannot be used for parking. The Planning Commission was primarily interested in having the same conditions on this zoning as applied to the zoning to the east. The primary objection of the applicant is the "no parking" adjacent to the common fence line. The other condition placed upon adjacent zoning was that buildings would be only 1 story. This same condition was recommended on this case, and the applicant has indicated a problem that if the buildings are limited to 1 story, they would cover more land and require more space for parking. The zoning was recommended by the Commission with the exceptions. Mr. Jim Steed, representing the applicant, stated that the limitation of leaving the 25' strip in a natural state did not exist on the zoning immediately to the east and felt that he would be discriminated against if the natural state requirement was attached. At the time the property to the east was zoned, the owners were led to believe that public parking would be permitted in the 25' strip. The staff recommendation at the time this was filed recommended a 25' setback rather than a "B" Residence zoning because a new interpretation of the "B" Residence District would not permit public parking, whereas the 25' setback would. Because of the 1 story limitation, more space would have to be taken for building on the ground. Another concern of Mr. Steed's was that with the natural state limitation he felt the area would become a "no-man's-land" and the area would become a place for garbage to accumulate. He proposed an alternative to the application which would be that the 1 story limitation be limited to the back 100' of the property; and the front 200' be 1st Height and Area. In response to City Attorney Butler's question, Mr. Steed stated that the 25 feet in the rear would be "B" Residence District. Mr. Don Byer appeared in opposition and was associated with the Balcones Civic Association. He proposed that this be held in abeyance for a short period of time so the association and the Planning Department could meet and discuss the area in question. Mr. Byer wanted to see businesses in the area that would operate like an office by having working hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and he did not think this particular proposal would be suitable. He also noted that what was really important was just what would be operating in the area. Mr. Byer was concerned about the parking and buildings that would be higher than 1 story. - CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS- November 6, 1975 1173 In response to Councilmember Linn's question as to the type of businesses currently in the area, Mr. Byer noted that the only permanent business structure was a convenience store. Mayor Friedman stated that this entire area was under consideration for annexation and there was much concern about the area. Mr. Byer felt that the residents would request at a minimum that the restrictions of the Planning Commission be retained. This would be the 25' setback with no buildings and the limitation of 1 story. Mayor Friedman suggested that the zoning be postponed 1 week and Mr. Steed meet with Mr. Byer and neighbors as well as Mr. Lillie or his representative to reach a solution. Mr. Byer requested that a site plan be provided to give all concerned a better idea of how the project would adapt to the neighborhood. Councilmember Hofmann moved that the Council continue the public hearing on November 13, 1975. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Trevino, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann Noes: None S & W DESIGN, INC. C14-75-006 3706-3804 Southridge Drive, also bounded by Banister Lane, Morgan Lane, South- port Drive and Grayford Drive From "A" Residence and "B" Residence 1st Height and Area To a Planned Unit Development of 329 attached and detached single-family dwelling units with recreation and retail facilities and common open space called "Oak Run" Mr. Lillie stated that the Planned Unit Development would cover about 21 acres of land of which 13 acres was zoned by the Council for "BB" Residence zoning and the west 8 acres was still zoned "A" Residence. The Planned Unit Development has a gross density of under 20 units per acre with the "A" residential being 8.5 density and the "BB" portion density would be 19.9. The PUD site plans are submitted to about one dozen City departments and reviewed. Mr. Lillie noted that the PUD would be suitable to the general density pattern of the zoning currently applied. The Planning Commission has recommended the approval subject to the departmental requirements. Mr. Bill Scudder displayed drawings viewing the proposed PUD and commented that the only reason he applied for a PUD rather than proceeding to build apartments and duplexes on the land was he felt that the application of the existing subdivision ordinance was not a proper way to utilize the land. In reviewing the characteristics of the land, Mr. Scudder pointed out the reasons for not using the present subdivision. The slides provided showed trees and views of the City as well as the topography of the land. By following the CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS- November 6, 1975 1174 ۱۰ Planned Unit Development Ordinance rather than the existing subdivision lay-out, Mr. Scudder felt they had achieved better street design; natural drainage would be utilized rather than intercepting the water in streets, curbs, etc. Buildings would be located in response to the existing natural vegetation rather than the location the subdivision plan would create. Ground coverage would be created by combining paving and buildings of about 34% where most projects of this type would be in the 50% to 60% range. Within the PUD area a convenience shopping would be included. By having this convenience shopping within the Planned Unit Development, Mr. Scudder felt it would reduce the amount of traffic going to other shopping areas. As a matter of planning, there would be 1 convenience shopping facility required for each 300 dwelling units. For the aforementioned reasons, he felt the Planned Unit Development of the land was a proper way rather than proceeding with the present zoning and subdivision ordinance. He concluded by pointing out that the proposed density would be less then the density that could be achieved with the present zoning. Councilmember Hofmann noted that she had viewed the proposed area and reiterated that the buildings were constructed according to the vegetation and commended Mr. Scudder on the design of the buildings. Mr. Scudder showed slides to the Council which viewed prototypes that were built about one year ago to aid in developing the present PUD. He stated that all the buildings were designed to relate to the trees and a great deal of input had been contributed to preserve the present trees. In response to Councilmember Linn's questions, Mr. Scudder commented that the density was lower than it would be if it were used at its present zoning. The percentage of the land that would be covered with buildings and asphalt would be 34%. In reference to the number of trees that would be destroyed, Mr. Scudder estimated that there would be approximately 60 trees cut. He noted that if the area were developed "A" Residence District, there would be considerably more trees cut because of the destructive nature of the Subdivision Ordinance. Councilmember Linn asked Mr. Scudder if he would be agreeable to consider as part of the permit the stipulation regarding ground coverage and the saving of trees. Mr. Scudder stated he would be agreeable to what had been proposed in his plan. DEBRA MALL, 304 Clawson Road, stated that the reason some of the residents did not appear at the Planning Commission meeting was due to not receiving notice of the hearing. She expressed appreciation for the effort that had gone into the development of the PUD: however, the neighborhood would not live in the PUD. Ms. Mall felt that there had not been sufficient study of the additional traffic that would be created on Clawson Road because of the development. By having the increased traffic on Clawson Road, she felt that it would eventually bring about the widening of the road and create other problems. Ms. Mall indicated that there had been no consideration for parks or recreational spaces for people other than the ones living in the PUD. At this time, she presented some alternatives that if done, would possibly alleviate some of the traffic problems on Clawson. 1. There was hesitation concerning the convenience store and she definitely felt that this would increase automobile traffic. If the convenience store must stay in the area, Ms. Mall felt that it should be in the middle of the development or at the rear of the development. _ CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS November 6, 1975 1175 2. Also, something should be done with the unimproved lots that are located on the left side of the "BB" Residence arrangement. Possibly it could be made into a park. 3. There should be more rigorous guidelines set forth as to when or when not a PUD could add more retail development, and what exactly does stop domino theory from occurring. 4. The Planning Department has considered turning Clawson Road into a cul-de-sac where it intersects Fortview Road. By turning it into a cul-de-sac, Ms. Mall felt that it would eliminate much of the transient traffic that has been generated on Clawson Road. Ms. Mall felt that the development be delayed until some type of constructive plan could be developed about the traffic on Clawson Road. One of the residents in the area stated that there was tremendous traffic on Clawson Road and felt that regardless of where the entrances were to the development, there would still be a tremendous amount of traffic. He pointed out that they were not against the project, but were concerned about the impact of the project on the traffic. He requested that there be additional time alloted to study the plan. Councilmember Hofmann noted that Clawson Road was in the CIP project and that possibly this would help alleviate some of the problems. Mayor Friedman pointed out that there had been several requests from residents on Clawson Road for the widening of the road. Ms. Mall commented that it was her understanding that Clawson Road would not be widened but that only a bump would be removed from the road. Mayor Friedman pointed out that whether there was a PUD or not, the facts and figures concerning Clawson Road were already present and there was already a problem existing. City Manager Davidson commented that Clawson Road was scheduled for engineering during the current year of the CIP subject to the bond election. Construction would be undertaken during the fiscal year 1976-77. As to the amount of work involved, there would be a leveling out of the hazardous grade problem. There are not any plans at the present time for complete widening of the street. BILL CORSBIE, a resident on Clawson Road, commended the project that had been developed, but he was concerned about the traffic on Clawson Road also. He noted that there were several children in the area and the traffic was very heavy. Also he stated that there was an area at the end of the road that would fill with water after a heavy rain. Mr. Corsbie felt that this would be a good area for development of a lake. He felt this would be an alternative to Clawson Road that would solve a major traffic problem in the area. Mayor Friedman felt that this did not speak to whether a PUD should be planned in the area. In referring to Clawson Road becoming a cul-de-sac, he commented that it had not been presented to the Council. ! November 6, 1975 1176 _ CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS- Councilmember Hofmann pointed out that one could not stop growth, but all should try and work with the developer in doing the best possible job of growth. Mr. Corsbie agreed with Councilmember Hofmann but also felt that some investment should be made regarding the development of a park and lake. Mayor Friedman suggested that the Parks and Recreation Board investigate this idea, and what was needed at the present would be a meeting with interested neighbors and Mr. Scudder to allow everyone an opportunity to understand the project. Mr. Scudder felt that since there were a large number of land owners in the area, he suggested that possibly a neighborhood association could be formulated. Councilmember Linn indicated she was impressed with the project in that it would save more trees and the natural land than any other project. One of the residents felt that the main concern of the residents was the 50' strip of land that duplexe would be built on. By erecting the duplex on this land, it would create a very limited amount of space between his property and the proposed project. He was opposed to the duplex being two stories, and was agreeable to having a meeting. In response to Councilmember Hofmann's question concerning the Morgan Lane outlet for traffic, Mayor Friedman commented this would only force the problem of traffic to Clawson Road. GILBERT GODINA, a resident in the area, stated that he missed the meeting that was conducted by the Planning Commission and felt that there should have been more meetings conducted. He was opposed to the two-story apartments and the proximity of the project. NICK VON CHRYSLER appeared before the Council representing Mr. and Mrs. N. L. Walker and other property owners in the area. He approved of the proposed development but the property of his clients was located at the top of the hill and he felt that by the development his clients would be locked in without any access to the rear. Mayor Friedman noted that if roads were opened at the point in question, the whole PUD concept would be destroyed. Mr. Von Chrysler asked that this be postponed to allow more time for discussion. Councilmember Hofmann moved that the Council continue the hearing next week. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Linn, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmember Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn Noes: None ZONING DENIED MARCELL MEDLOCK C14-75-099 1901 East 16th Street From "A" Residence also bounded by Chicon 1st Height and Area Το "LR" Local Retail 1st Height and Area NOT Recommended by the Planning Commission _ CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS November 6, 1975 1177 Councilmember Lebermann moved that the Council deny the zoning change. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Linn, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman Noes: None RELEASE OF EASEMENTS Councilmember Lebermann moved that the Council adopt a resolution authorizing release of the following easement:: The existing drainage easement twenty-five (25.00) feet in width in Lot 7, Block B, Spicewood at Balcones Village, Section One. (Requested by Bryant-Curington, Inc., representing Mr. Stanley Phelps, owner) The motion, seconded by Councilmember Hofmann, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell Noes: None Councilmember Lebermann moved that the Council adopt a resolution authorizing release of the following easement: All of that certain drainage easement twenty-five (25.00) feet in width across the rear portion of Lot 6, Block B, Spicewood at Balcones Village Section One. (Requested by Bryant-Curington, Inc., representing Spicewood Development Corporation, owner) The motion, seconded by Councilmember Hofmann, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell Noes: None PARKING METER ZONE Councilmember Lebermann moved that the Council adopt a resolution authorizing the following parking meter zone: STREET East 10th Street DELETE ZONE 30-60 BLOCK 200 SIDE North City Manager Davidson commented that the meters were installed by the Urban Transportation Department thinking that they already had the Council's approval to proceed and now it was before the Council for approval. November 6, 1975 1178 _ CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS The motion, seconded by Councilmember Hofmann, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmember Himmelblau Noes: None CONTRACT WITH STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE Councilmember Linn moved that the Council adopt a resolution authorizing the execution of a contract with the State Department of Public Welfare which will match 70/30 the majority of the City's grant to United Action for the Elderly made September 25, 1975. (Contract period from October 1, 1975, through September 30, 1976.) The motion, seconded by Councilmember Trevino, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Lebermann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann Noes: None MODEL CITIES GRANT BUDGET AGREEMENT Councilmember Lebermann moved that the Council adopt a resolution authorizing the approval of a Model Cities Grant Budget Agreement with the Department of Housing and Urban Development to extend the time for expending remaining Model Cities funds to December 31, 1975. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Himmelblau, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann Noes: None IMPLEMENTATION OF MINORITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM The Council had before it for consideration the implementation of a Minority Economic Development Program through the Department of Purchases and Stores. Mayor Friedman stated that this would be in conjunction with another item on the agenda concerning Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action for Minority Entrepreneurs. Councilmember Linn felt that the wording should be Economic Development Program for Minorities and Women because with the current wording she did not think it informed women or others that they were included in the minorities. Councilmember Trevino read from the policy and pointed out that the word, "women" was included in the policy. Councilmember Linn definitely felt that when the policy was referred to, that it be pointed out that women would be included. Mr. Bert Adams, employed by the Texas office of Minority Business Enterprise, appeared before the Council and felt that there was a problem with the title of minority business persons. He defined this by stating that a minority business person was one that was socially and economically disadvantaged -CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS November 6, 1975 1179 He noted that there was nothing mentioned about race, creed, color or religion. In referring to the word disadvantaged, Mr. Adams commented that a person was disadvantaged because there was a lack of money or not enough access to it. Also a lack of education would create problems. By lacking these items, the disadvantaged business person would not be in a position to participate in competing with the majority of businessmen in the market place. Mr. Adams concluded his thought by commenting that he hoped he had placed the proper prospective on definition of the minority business person. He Mr. Albert Rodriquez, Director of the Texas office of Minority Business Enterprise, commended Councilmember Trevino for his proposing of the program for minority purchasing and procurement. He pointed out that Austin was the first City in Texas to formulate a special office of minority procurement. One of the major problems of the minority business person was in the area of procurement, and he felt that this proposal would be beneficial in this area. urged the Council to favorably consider the proposal because it would be not only for the benefit of the minority community but also because there would be economic fallout from the program. (1) More monies to the minority business community would mean a sounder tax base. (2) A substantial minority business community would insure that the free enterprise system would work to the fullest extent. In conclusion, Mr. Rodriguez stated that the program would provide a helping hand and not a hand-out. Mr. James Stewart, member of the Forward Movement of Minority Contractors, asked the Council if there had been a coordinator for the office. Mayor Friedman noted that no one had been hired for the position. Mr. Stewart suggested that a friendly amendment be attached to the proposal which would state that Black businessmen and women as well as Mexican-American businessmen and women each would share the grant on, a 50/50 basis. Councilmember Trevino noted that it was open whereby anyone that was qualified could compete for the money. The City administration would review the proposal and then recommend them to the Council for approval. Councilmember Lebermann stated that under the terms of the ordinance, it would be possible and proper for an Angle just beginning a new business to take advantage of the program. Councilmember Trevino pointed out that by no means was the poor Anglo, handicapped or elderly being discouraged to participate in the program. Mayor Pro Tem Snell felt that what Mr. Stewart was thinking would be the guarantee that the money would be equally distributed among the trainees. Councilmember Trevino noted that the Council would have the final word on approval. Councilmember Trevino moved that the Council adopt a resolution authorizing implementation of a Minority Economic Development Program through the Department of Purchases and Stores. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Hofmann, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmember Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn Noes: None November 6, 1975 1180 _ CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS CONSIDERATION OF BIDS ! Councilmember Lebermann moved that the Council adopt a resolution approving the consideration of bids received for the sale of a surplus tract of City-owned property located at 1508 West 37th Street. The motion, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Snell, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn, Trevino Noes: None CONTRACTS AWARDED Councilmember Lebermann moved that the Council adopt a resolution awarding the following contract: AUSTIN ENGINEERING COMPANY P. O. Box 3255 Austin, Texas - - Drainage Improvements Scarlet View Drive Easement from Barton Hills Drive to approximately 150 feet north of Barton Hills Drive $15,855.00. (home builder will pay 50% $7,927.50) The motion, seconded by Councilmember Himmelblau, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman Noes: None Councilmember Lebermann moved that the Council adopt a resolution awarding the following contract: DIAMOND SHAMROCK CORPORATION 1006 Main Street Houston, Texas - Liquid Chlorine in one-ton cylinders, used in water treatment, Water and Wastewater Treatment. Twelve Months Supply Agreement Item No. 1, estimated 1083 tons, initial price $184.80/ton The motion, seconded by Councilmember Himmelblau, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman Noes: None November 6, 1975 1181 _ CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS- Councilmember Lebermann moved that the Council adopt a resolution awarding the following contract: ARLINGTON EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1511 Industrial Court Arlington, Texas Street Flusher, Vehicle & Equipment Services Department Item 1 - $9,817.00 The motion, seconded by Councilmember Himmelblau, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman Noes: None Councilmember Lebermann moved that the Council adopt a resolution awarding the following contracts: Bid Award: Retread and Section Repair of Tires, Vehicle and Equipment Services. Twelve Months Supply Agreement. YOUNGBLOOD GENERAL TIRE COMPANY 506 North Lamar Boulevard Items 1 thru 16 - $7,172.64 Austin, Texas WALKER TIRE COMPANY Items 17 thru 22 $1,693.50 7107 North Lamar Boulevard Austin, Texas PERRY ROSE FIRESTONE Items 23 thru 25 $1,347.23 2201 Airport Boulevard Austin, Texas TIRE MILEAGE OF AUSTIN Items 26 thru 30 $8,796.12 3902 Woodbury Street Austin, Texas The motion, seconded by Councilmember Himmelblau, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman Noes: None ADOPTION OF PAVING ASSESSMENT POLICIES The Council had before it for adoption the revised paving assessment policies. Mayor Pro Tem Snell stated that he would like to insert the following amendment to the assessment policy: November 6, 1975 1182 CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT: When the assessment policies herein established directly concern any individual or group of individuals who because of educational deficiencies, language barriers, or for other reasons may not fully comprehend the nature and/or details of such assessments; the appropriate City staff members shall take whatever steps necessary to insure the complete comprehension of such action by residents involved. This clause particularly applies to instances in which residents involved were not parties to the petitioning of such action. City Attorney Butler pointed out that this could be inserted at the conclusion of the paving assessment policy. Councilmember Linn commented that on another item in the agenda concerning improvements to streets, she had received calls from two elderly residents on Adalee Avenue requesting that since they were on a fixed income, that they be charged under the lower rate for paving assessment. City Manager Davidson stated that the Council should have the right to determine if this should be done; however, there were several that should not be given the privilege of being under the old policy. Mr. Homer Reed, Deputy City Manager, indicated that this request could be accepted under the old policy. Councilmember Hofmann requested that the two blocks in the area of Adalee Avenue be paved as soon as possible. Councilmember Lebermann moved that the Council adopt a resolution for the revised paving assessment policies including Mayor Pro Tem Snell's amendment. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Linn, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell Noes: None PUBLIC HEARING POSTPONEMENT Due to some of the Councilmembers being out of town on the dates set for the public hearings, Mayor Friedman suggested that the hearings be postponed until a later date. Councilmember Himmelblau moved that the Council postpone the public hearings scheduled on November 20, 1975, and December 4, 1975, until a later date. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Hofmann, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Hofmann, Linn, Lebermann, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmember Himmelblau Noes: None November 6, 1975 1183 CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS: ZONING ORDINANCE Mayor Friedman introduced the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE ORDERING A CHANGE IN USE AND HEIGHT AND AREA AND CHANGING THE USE AND HEIGHT AND AREA MAPS ACCOMPANYING CHAPTER 45 OF THE AUSTIN CITY CODE OF 1967 AS FOLLOWS: A 28.58 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, BOUNDED ON THE EAST BY CAMERON ROAD AND ON THE SOUTH BY U. S. HIGHWAY 183, FROM INTERIM "A" RESIDENCE, INTERIM FIRST HEIGHT AND AREA DISTRICT TO "D" INDUSTRIAL, FIRST HEIGHT AND AREA DISTRICT; SAID PROPERTY BEING LOCATED IN AUSTIN, TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS; SUSPENDING THE RULE REQUIRING THE READING OF ORDINANCES ON THREE SEPARATE DAYS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (Edward Joseph, Trustee, C14-75-101) Councilmember Linn moved that the Council waive the requirement for three readings, declare an emergency and finally pass the ordinance effective immediately. The motion, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Snell, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Lebermann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann Noes: None The Mayor announced that the ordinance had been finally passed. ORDINANCES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS Mayor Friedman introduced the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING THE PAVING AND IMPROVEMENT OF PORTIONS OF CERTAIN STREETS IN THE CITY OF AUSTIN, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUCH WORK, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS, DIRECTING THE PREPARATION OF ESTIMATES, INVOKING THE ALTERNATE PROCEDURE PROVIDED BY ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN AND CHAPTER 106 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGISLATURE OF TEXAS, DETERMINING THAT THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PAID BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN, PROVIDING A METHOD OF REIMBURSING THE CITY OF AUSTIN FOR A PORTION OF SUCH COSTS BY ASSESSMENT OF A PORTION OF SUCH COSTS AGAINST THE PROPERTY ABUTTING SUCH STREETS OR PORTIONS THEREOF TO BE IMPROVED, AND FOR THE FIXING OF A LIEN TO SECURE PAYMENT OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS, STATING THE TIME AND MANNER PROPOSED FOR PAYMENT OF ALL SUCH COSTS, DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO CAUSE A NOTICE OF THE ENACTMENT OF THIS ORDINANCE TO BE FILED IN THE MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST RECORDS OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (Rundberg Lane) Councilmember Lebermann moved that the Council waive the requirement for three readings, declare an emergency and finally pass the ordinance effective immediately. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Trevino, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann Noes: None The Mayor announced that the ordinance had been finally passed. _ CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS November 6, 1975 1184 Mayor Friedman introduced the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING THE PAVING AND IMPROVEMENT OF PORTIONS OF CERTAIN STREETS IN THE CITY OF AUSTIN, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUCH WORK, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS, DIRECTING THE PREPARATION OF ESTIMATES, INVOKING THE ALTERNATE PROCEDURE PROVIDED BY ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN AND CHAPTER 106 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGISLATURE OF TEXAS, DETERMINING THAT THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PAID BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN, PROVIDING A METHOD OF REIMBURSING THE CITY OF AUSTIN FOR A PORTION OF SUCH COSTS BY ASSESSMENT OF A PORTION OF SUCH COSTS AGAINST THE PROPERTY ABUTTING SUCH STREETS OR PORTIONS THEREOF TO BE IMPROVED, AND FOR THE FIXING OF A LIEN TO SECURE PAYMENT OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS, STATING THE TIME AND MANNER PROPOSED FOR PAYMENT OF ALL SUCH COSTS, DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO CAUSE A NOTICE OF THE ENACTMENT OF THIS ORDINANCE TO BE FILED IN THE MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST RECORDS OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (Webberville Road) Councilmember Lebermann moved that the Council waive the requirement for three readings, declare an emergency and finally pass the ordinance effective immediately. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Trevino, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann Noes: None The Mayor announced that the ordinance had been finally passed. Mayor Friedman introduced the following ordinance: AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE NECESSITY FOR AND ORDERING THE PAVING AND IMPROVEMENT OF PORTIONS OF CERTAIN STREETS IN THE CITY OF AUSTIN, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SUCH WORK, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS, DIRECTING THE PREPARATION OF ESTIMATES, INVOKING THE ALTERNATE PROCEDURE PROVIDED BY ARTICLE I, SECTION 5 OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN AND CHAPTER 106 OF THE ACTS OF THE FIRST CALLED SESSION OF THE 40TH LEGISLATURE OF TEXAS, DETERMINING THAT THE COST OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PAID BY THE CITY OF AUSTIN, PROVIDING A METHOD OF REIMBURSING THE CITY OF AUSTIN FOR A PORTION OF SUCH COSTS BY ASSESSMENT OF A PORTION OF SUCH COSTS AGAINST THE PROPERTY ABUTTING SUCH STREETS OR PORTIONS THEREOF TO BE IMPROVED, AND FOR THE FIXING OF A LIEN TO SECURE PAYMENT OF SUCH ASSESSMENTS, STATING THE TIME AND MANNER PROPOSED FOR PAYMENT OF ALL SUCH COSTS, DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO CAUSE A NOTICE OF THE ENACTMENT OF THIS ORDINANCE TO BE FILED IN THE MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST RECORDS OF TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. (Adalee Avenue and other streets) CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS November 6, 1975 1185 Councilmember Lebermann moved that the Council waive the requirement for three readings, declare an emergency and finally pass the ordinance effective immediately. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Trevino, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann Noes: None The Mayor announced that the ordinance had been finally passed. REPORT CONCERNING HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS City Manager Davidson stated that this item concerned the listing of a report prepared by the Urban Transportation Department as requested by the Council. The report outlined the contractual agreements or arrangements that are maintained with the Department of Highways and Public Transportation for Texas. Mr. Davidson wanted the Council to study the booklet that had been prepared and at a later date a special work session would be requested to spend time in reviewing the projects. It had been suggested by Mr. Joe Ternus, Director of Urban Transportation, that when the meeting was held members of the Texas Highway Department be invited to attend. Mr. Davidson requested that he would like to return to the Council at a later date and ask for a date for the work session. Mayor Friedman suggested that a Wednesday afternoon would be an appropriate time for this session. CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS November 6, 1975 1186 REPORT ON WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICES City Manager Davidson noted that this report was concerning a recommendation that he was requesting of the Council so that some water service facilities could be completed along U. S. Highway 183 which would enable water service to be provided to the Eagle Signal Corporation development. In referring to the information submitted on the item, he commented that there would be a portion of the project that would have to be paid for by the Eagle Signal Corporation. The only part the City would be responsible for was the portion that could be justified to complete the loop type system and water system for the area. Mr. Davidson asked if the Council would concur with this method of completing the water service along Highway 183. Funds are contained in the CIP program for this project. Councilmember Lebermann moved that the Council authorize concurring with the recommended method of service. The motion, seconded by Councilmember Trevino, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Councilmembers Noes: Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann None Not in Council Chamber when roll was called: Mayor Pro Tem Snell AFTERNOON SESSION 2:00 Ρ.Μ. Mayor Friedman called the afternoon session to order. EXECUTIVE SESSION Mayor Friedman announced that the Council had been in an executive session earlier and had discussed appointments to the Community Development Commission. A report would be given concerning this later in the meeting. APPEARANCE CONCERNING DRAG VENDORS Ms. Kathy Kraye appeared before the Council concerning a statement she wanted to present. She felt that the rights of the citizens had once again been violated. In referring to a statement that had been made concerning her resignation, Ms. Kraye stated that she had not resigned from the Vending Committee and also was never contacted that she had resigned from the committee. Mayor Friedman noted that he was informed that she had changed her classification and was willing to resign since she was no longer an importer. Ms. Kraye commented that she had not changed her classification. Mayor Friedman pointed out that it was his understanding that Ms. Kraye noted that she would resign if someone of her choice was appointed to replace her. He stated that the Council could not accept appointments in this manner and understood this was a resignation on her part. _ CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS November 6, 1975 1187 Mr. David Whitehill expressed the disappointment of the vendors concerning Ms. Kraye's resignation since she has sold on the Drag on a regular basis. Mayor Friedman stated that he was sorry that there was a misinterpretation and the Council had an obligation under the ordinance to appoint a 7-person commission. Mr. Whitehill felt that when the new appointment was made, there was not any input from the Drag. Mayor Friedman pointed out that several names had been received from the Drag concerning the appointment. Mr. Whitehill felt that the importer representative, Betsy Sanders, was not experienced enough to represent some of the vendors. Mayor Friedman commented that he had not received any complaints relating to the composition of the committee. Mr. Whitehill indicated that the artists and craftsmen selling on the Drag felt that they were not represented properly by Alice Roberts since she was not on the Drag that much. He asked the Council if they would be receptive to the artists and craftsmen submitting another name for the committee. Mayor Friedman felt that he was satisfied with the present commission, and thought that they needed the opportunity to continue and finish work. Mayor Pro Tem Snell stated that names were submitted to the Council for the commission and those names were voted on by the Council. Ms. Kraye commented that the commission refused to have weekly meetings or receive calls concerning issues that would arise. Mayor Friedman noted that according to the ordinance that was passed, after Christmas the commission was supposed to work out a program to end the present confusion that occurs every Christmas. He suggested that there be some checking to see when these meetings are being held. Mayor Pro Tem Snell noted that a record of the meetings that were not being attended should be maintained. Mayor Friedman suggested that everyone should attempt to work with the commission to solve any problems. APPEARANCE CONCERNING A RESOLUTION Alice Embree had requested to appear before City Council to present a resolution and request the Council's endorsement of the resolution; however, Mr. Cam Cunnington appeared in her stead. He pointed out that he would present a resolution to the Council and request their endorsement. Mr. Cunnington referred to a meeting that would be held in Austin with Vice-President Rockefeller in attendance. Mr. Cunnington felt that the policies of President Ford had not solved any of the economic problems in the country, and felt the economy was controlled by a small group of people. He urged the Council to support the resolution and meetings that would be held in conjunction with the upcoming visit. Councilmember Linn stated that she had a personal response to the proposal and commented that she would not desire to publicly proclaim the resolution because there would possibly be people in the community that would be moved to attempt assassination. _ CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS November 6, 1975 1188 Mr. Cunnington responded by stating that if people are allowed the opportunity to express their views, then this would tend to depress people from taking other means of action. He was encouraging the citizens of Austin to inform the Ford administration and Vice-President Rockefeller of their position on the issues. There was not a motion to endorse the resolution. SELECTION OF RETIREMENT BOARD ELECTION COMMITTEE Councilmember Himmelblau moved that the following people be placed on the Retirement Board Nominating and Election Committee: Jafus Cavil Randy Turner Roy Fuerrero Lorraine Yancy Jane McFarland کو Health Department Tax Department - PARD Human Resources - Public Information The motion, seconded by Councilmember Linn, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmember Trevino, Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn Noes: None COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION Councilmember Trevino moved that the following people be nominated to the Community Development Commission: Representing Public Officials Richel Rivers Mrs. Betty (Billy) Washington Representing Private Sector Lois Watson Arthur Gil The motion, seconded by Councilmember Linn, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Friedman, Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn, Trevino Noes: None BOND ELECTION Mr. Homer Reed, Deputy City Manager, reviewed the arrangements for the bond election and stated that it would be necessary to decide on the order of the items that would appear on the ballot. The order would be as follows: _ CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS November 6, 1975 1189 1. The issuance of general obligation park funds in the amount of $12.5 million. t 2. Library improvements in the amount of $1.9 million. 3. Public Health facilities including neighborhood health centers and health administration buildings in the amount of $2.7 million. 4. The hospital in the amount of $3.65 million. 5. Fire facilities in the amount of $1.7 million. 6. Arena in the amount of $3.5 million. 7. Police and Public works service centers in the amount of $750,000.00. 8. Airport in the amount of $800,000.00. 9. Street improvements including bridges, culverts, drainage and sidewalks, $14.63 million. 10. Drainage improvements in the amount of $970,000.00. 11. Water works system extensions and improvements $88 million. 12. Sewer system extensions and improvements - $74 million. Mayor Friedman stated that this was discussed at the Executive Session because of the requirement of legal opinion and complying with City ordinances in calling a proper election. Councilmember Linn moved that the Council accept the aforementioned report concerning the bond election. The motion, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Snell, carried by the following vote: Ayes: Mayor Pro Tem Snell, Councilmembers Himmelblau, Hofmann, Lebermann, Linn, Trevino, Mayor Friedman Noes: None ATTEST: ADJOURNMENT The Council adjourned at 2:49 p.m. Brace Monroe City Clerk APPROVED Mayor