Back to Archives

Austin's Future: Highways, High-Rises, Power

Thursday, February 11, 1982 regular
  • Airport Development Shift

    Officials decided against the Bergstrom West airport expansion due to military concerns, opting to re-evaluate alternative sites and consultant reports.
  • Mo-Pac Expansion Vote

    An election was scheduled for April 3, 1982, to decide on completing the Mo-Pac Boulevard highway, with the exact ballot wording to be finalized later.
  • Downtown High-Rise Approval

    A controversial plan allowing a new building to construct an aerial section over a downtown alley was approved, despite public debate on its impact on urban scale.
  • Key City Planning Discussions

    Future discussions were initiated on long-range electricity generation needs, while a proposed new landscape ordinance was sent back for further review.

Full Transcript

YOFAU FOUNDED 1839 Austin City Council MINUTES For February 11, 1982 -- 3:00 Ρ.Μ. Council Chambers, 301 West Second Street, Austin, Texas Memorandum To: City Council Carole Keeton McClellan Mayor John Treviño, Jr. Mayor Pro Tem Council Members Larry Deuser Roger Duncan Richard Goodman Ron Mullen Charles E. Urdy Nicholas M. Meiszer City Manager Grace Monroe City Clerk Mayor McClellan called to order the Meeting of the Council, scheduled for 3:00p.m., noting the presence of all Councilmembers. FIRST QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT Mr. Phil Scheps, Director of Finance, presented the First Quarter Financial Report. He said Brackenridge Hospital will be a problem and a loss situation. He also said the General Fund shows too small an ending balance. Mr. Scheps also said the self insurance program is not looking good. All other funds are all right, and there is no problem with the Electric Department. Mayor McClellan requested a report as soon as possible on the self insurance program. AGENDA ITEM PULLED A City Manager Report on Water and Wastewater Master Plan Public Participation Process was pulled off the Agenda. BERGSTROM WEST CONCEPT Mr. Bayless, Director of the Airport, reviewed the Bergstrom West Plan. He said it is technically sound and would solve the airport problem for Austin. However, he said the 29 concerns as put forth by the Air Force cannot be pursued with good conscience. He cited restrictions of non-scheduled flights, no general aviation, legal problems with liability requirements for the City even if the Air Force is at fault, the one year termination condition at the determination of the Secretary of the Air Force, among the 29 concerns that would create problems for the City. Council Memo BERGSTROM WEST - (Continued) 2 February 11, 1982 : Mr. Bayless suggested the Council may want to reactivate the Citizens Task Force and study, (1) short range planning for Mueller; (2) look at Manor site again. Mayor McClellan said if the task force is reactivated, some new people should be added and they should be given an outline of their duties and the dollar allocation. Mr. Bayless said Austin had a 9.6% passenger traffic increase last year with 1,955,000 passengers served last year. Mayor McClellan is of the opinion that Austin does not have the luxury of not doing anything. Councilmember Mullen said that since the consultants came to the ultimate decision that Manor is the best site, then the City should get started with developing the Manor site. He thinks that before the task force is reactivated, the consultant, R. Dixon Speas, should be brought back to give their report before Council. Mayor McClellan suggested a work session with former members of the task force. She said the scheduled February 24, 1982 work session concerning general aviation should be cancelled. Councilmember Deuser thought Council should try one more time with the Bergstrom West Plan and reply to the proposal set forth by the Air Force. He said their questions should be answered and find out if their demands are negotiable. said no. Councilmember Urdy said it is his opinion that the Air Force has already Motion - Died for Lack of Second Councilmember Deuser made a motion to reply to the Air Force with the best answers Austin can give to their 29 questions. No one seconded the motion. Councilmember Goodman said he does not favor Bergstrom West and does not think the Air Force is in favor of it either. Councilmember Mullen said he does not want to send a letter unless there is a strong push by Council and they are unanimous in wanting Bergstrom West. Mr. Bayless told Council he does not think Bergstrom West is viable in any way as far as the Air Force is concerned. i Motion Councilmember Mullen made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Goodman to close the discussion. Friendly Amendment - Not Accepted Councilmember Goodman offered a friendly amendment to direct staff to reply to the Air Force in a realistic fashion. His amendment was not accepted. ! Council Memo BERGSTROM WEST - (Continued) 3 Friendly Amendment 1 February 11, 1982 Mayor McClellan offered a friendly amendment to contact Speas, the consulting firm, and have a work session. Councilmember Mullen and Councilmember Goodman accepted her friendly amendment. Friendly Amendment Councilmember Goodman offered a friendly amendment to thank the Air Force for their reply. The friendly amendment was accepted. Further discussion ensued. Call for Question Councilmember Mullen called for the question. 7-0 Vote Roll Call on Motion with Amendments 6-1 Vote, Councilmember Deuser voted No. NPSE GOVERNMENT PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AWARD Mr. John German, Director of Public Works, told Council he had been in Phoenix to accept the NSPE Government Professional Development Award which recognized the City of Austin for outstanding development by engineers of the City. LIBRARY DISCUSSED 1 Mr. Roland DeNoie appeared before Council to discuss library policies. He could not understand why his son had to wait 14 days for a library card after application. Mr. Holt, Library Director, said they had not been able to establish the fact that Mr. DeNoie is a resident of Austin. He also said the library has tighter controls and it takes 14 days to get a card the first time someone applies. Mayor McClellan asked Mr. Holt to consider a temporary card, and gave her card to Mr. DeNoie's son to use to check out the book he needs. WATER QUALITY OF BARTON SPRINGS Ms. Dorothy Richter appeared before Council to discuss the water quality of Barton Springs. She also said it is difficult to find out when the pool is closed because of pollution. Mayor McClellan asked the City Manager to request staff to report on how the public can find out when the pool is closed. Council Memo WATER QUALITY - (Continued) 4 February 11, 1982 Mr. Frank Cooksey discussed the water quality of Barton Springs. ZONING ROLL BACK Mr. Richard Buratti discussed zoning roll backs. DENSITY AND "INFILL" Mr. Frank Harren appeared before Council to express his opinion on density and "infill". He said the citizens of Austin support the completion of MoPac and that nothing shows that development has caused any pollution of Barton Creek. service. WATER & WASTEWATER SERVICE DISCUSSED Mr. Pete Dwyer appeared before Council and discussed water and wastewater ATTITUDES FOR DEVELOPMENT Mr. Philip L. Bible, III, appeared before Council to express his opinion on attitudes for development. WATER AND WASTEWATER SERVICE REQUESTED Mr. W. Travis Williamson appeared before Council to request approval of water and wastewater for property in N.W. Travis County adjoining the City of Austin. He asked they be put in Growth Area 4. Councilmember Goodman requested a report concerning the service line. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Mr. Charles D. Primeaux appeared before Council to request approval of a site development plan and asked Council to grant requested variances. He said he wanted to short form a subdivision and was denied because it is less than 1 acre. asked Council to review. Mayor McClellan stated a report from the Health Department is required. He Council Memo 5 February 11, 1982 LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE Council discussed the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance concerning landscaping. Councilmember Deuser discussed his version of the Landscape Ordinance. Motion Made, No Second, Withdrawn approve his version of the Councilmember Deuser made a motion to Ordinance.. There was no second to the motion and he withdrew it. Councilmember Duncan discussed the ordinance. He said the revised Planning Commission version is the most fair. Motion Died for Lack of Second - Councilmember Duncan made a motion to adopt the revised Planning Commission version. There was no second to the motion. Council discussed some more and made the following motion: Motion The Council on Councilmember Goodman's motion, Councilmember Duncan's second, voted to send the four drafts of the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance concerning landscaping (Planning Commission original draft, Councilmember. Deuser's draft, Apartment Association revision and Planning Commission revision) to the Planning Department for review with a fiscal note. (Legal Department and Building Inspection Department to participate in review.) (7-0 Vote) ZONING HEARING Mayor McClellan opened the public hearing set for 6:00 p.m. on the following application: C14r-81 From "AA" 1st H&A CORNERSTONE 015 DEVELOPMENT 6907 Capital of Texas Hwy. North To "O" 2nd H&A COMPANY NOT RECOMMENDED By Mike Guerrero RECOMMENDED "0-1" 1st H&A with Items 1, 2, & 3 as set out in applicant's letter. Ms. Donna Kristaponis, Assistant Planning Director, reviewed the application. Mr. Guerrero, representing the applicant, presented their views. Edward Lee and Girard Kinney, architects of the proposed building discussed the plans and said there will be no driveway on Lakewood. 1 Council Memo HEARING - (Continued) 6 February 11, 1982 : Charles Graves, representing the applicant, told Council all requirements have been met and discussed the water quality design. Don Walden, Cornerstone Development Company owner, discussed the proposed project. Bill Gurasich discussed the FAA and interference. to the tower by telephones. He said it probably would be better to put the tower on the buildings. Charles Bounds said the area is zoned residential and should be left as it is. A few residences could be built on the site. Mrs. Marjorie Bounds said 97% of the people in Lakewood are against a zoning change. A man who did not identify himself said he has great concern. He does not want the zoning changed. Richard Wackerbarth, Balcones Civic Association president, said they do not feel an office complex is wrong but they do oppose 2nd H&A and prefer access from Lakewood rather than curb cuts on 360, Mark Woods spoke against more offices. He said the offices on MoPac are not leased and they do not need more on Loop 360. The 3 story height is not consistent with the neighborhood. Chuck Carsner is afraid 360 will turn into another MoPac or 183 and thinks this should be left as it is. Ann Havener, Lakewood resident, said once nature is destroyed it cannot be revitalized and asked Council to leave the area as it is. Polly Solsbee showed a map of the area and said offices are not appropriate. Grant Kinsler said this area's highest and best use is for multi-family. John Almay, Lakewood resident, thinks the are should remain residential. A woman who did not identify herself said the 360 area is the most beautiful around and there could be residences as there is not that much noise. Mr. Walden returned with his summation and stated they are Austin developers who will provide jobs. The market, he said, will consist of people who live in the area and asked Council's support. Motion The Council, on Councilmember Goodman's motion, Councilmember Mullen's second, closed the public hearing and scheduled for a vote next week after they have received a letter from FAA. (7-0 Vote) Council Memo 7 RECESS February 11, 1982 at 7:37 p.m. Council recessed its meeting at 7:14 p.m. and resumed its recessed meeting ACTION SCHEDULED Council was scheduled to take action on the following zoning case: C14-81 211 & h017 MICHAEL R. McHONE 608-612 W. 22nd St. (Burt House) WITH FINDING OF FACT (a), (d), (f), (k) and (1) Motion From "B" 2nd H&A Το "O-H" 2nd H&A RECOMMENDED "O-H" 1st because of criteria added by Commissioner Manning; subject to rendering and site plan. GRANTED AS RECOMMENDED AND CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING Councilmember Mullen made a motion, seconded by Mayor McClellan to grant the zoning as recommended with a restrictive covenant tied to the site plan that the building is to remain there. Substitute Motion Councilmember Deuser made a substitute motion, seconded by Councilmember Goodman to grant "O-H" 1st H&A as recommended by the Planning Commission.and close public hearing. Mayor McClellan said if they grant this, every house in town will want "H" zoning. Councilmember Goodman said the house does meet 5 of the criteria for historic zoning. Councilmember Mullen said he looked at the site and is concerned with people wanting a tax break on buildings which are not really historic. Councilmember Duncan said he does not feel that a precedent is being set for houses built the same year as the Burt House. Roll Call on Substitute Motion 4-3 Vote, Mayor Pro Tem Trevino, Councilmember Mullen and Mayor McClellan voted No. PUBLIC HEARING ON LICENSE AGREEMENT Mayor McClellan announced the public hearing, scheduled for 7:00 p.m. to consider authorizing a License Agreement to allow the aerial encroachment of a permanent building for occupancy over the Colorado Street Alley, 600 block minimum height 16.0'. (Requested by Rust Properties) Mr. German, Director of Public Works, stated all departments recommend Council Memo LICENSE AGREEMENT - (Continued) 8 February 11, 1982 approval of the aerial encroachment which will allow a 16' alley for pedestrian and vehicle use. The annual lease fee will be $28,450 per year with a two year escalation clause. Tom Francis, Rust Properties, appeared before Council to review the history of how the property in question was acquired and the plans to build across the alley. He referred to written correspondence from the City regarding utilization of the alley. He showed slides. Butch Reeve spoke in favor of the project. Smoot Carl-Mitchell, representing the Austin Neighborhood Council said they are concerned with the bulk and scale of the builaing and the amount of parking. Wayne Aldridge, business representative of the Carpenter's Union, spoke in favor of the project. He said it will create jobs and will be an asset to Congress Avenue. Susanna Smith Sullivan spoke against. Betty Phillips, Historic Landmark Commission, said the height and scale should be decreased. She is against. Alan Taniguchi suggested Council should look into the concept of intercept parking garages on the periphery of the downtown area with a shuttle system to downtown. Sander Shapiro, attorney representing Rust Properties, said there is no intrusion to downtown residents, becasue there are none, and he urged the approval. Mr. Sieders, Texans to Save the Capitol, favors height limitations. Musty Roller, president, We Care Austin, said the City should ask for lower height in return for aerial space. Ari Wright feels too much traffic will be created and is in favor of intercept parking. Charlotte Carl-Mitchell said the building will be higher than the Capitol and is against it. Fred Hogue, chairman, Betterment Committee of the Downtown Lion's Club, favors the project. Steve Harris, Austin Chamber of Commerce, spoke in favor. Palmer Wright said the alley rights should be given up only with a equal trade-off. Council Memo 9 February 11, 1982 LICENSE AGREEMENT - (Continued) Dick Stanford, Lake Austin Hill Country Neighborhood Association, spoke against. Charles Morton said the small property owners on Congress Avenue do not look at the Avenue as a museum and favors the license agreement. He said there will be a building over the alley in the 800 block of Congress so it should be all right in the 600 block. Vernon Nichols, construction worker, said the building should be built. A man who did not identify himself said he opposes glass structures but this building has been planned with the sanction of the Historic Landmark Commission and he is for it. i Charles Betts said the building will not intrude into the primary corridor and it is a quality project. Debby Darden said Council should investigate whether it will add or detract from the tax base, etc. Joe Riddell said the building is too tall and the City can get as much tax from four small buildings as they can from one big building. Ted Kochanski said the City is not a static structure and favors the license agreement. Richard Wackerbarth opposes the height. Sinclair Black supports intercept parking. Robert Foster Cherry questioned the height limitation of downtown buildings. Karen McGraw opposed. After Mr. Francis returned to present his summation, there was more discussion among the Council. Motion The Council, on Councilmember Mullen's motion, Mayor McClellan's second, closed the public hearing and adopted a resolution authorizing License Agreement to allow the aerial encroachment of a permanent building for occupancy over the Colorado Street Alley, 600 block minimum height 16.0'. (Requested by Rust Properties) (7-0 Vote) Council Memo LICENSE AGREEMENTS 10 - (Continued) Motion February 11, 1982 The Council, on Councilmember Duncan's motion, Mayor McClellan's second, adopted the following resolutions: (6-0 Vote, Councilmember Goodman was out of the room) a. For the use of public right-of-way for sidewalk extension and landscaping adjoining Block 70, Original City of Austin, West 6th Street 100 Block, Colorado Street, 600 Block and West 7th Street 100 Block. (Requested by Rust Properties b. To allow the use of public right-of-way for sidewalk extension and landscaping in the 700 Block of Colorado Street (west side) adjoining Lot 6, Original City of Austin. (Requested by Rust Properties) c. To allow the use of public right-of-way for sidewalk extension and landscaping in the 100 Block of West 7th Street (north side) adjoining Block 83, Original City of Austin. (Requested by Rust Properties) Council Memo 11 ELECTION RE MO-PAC BOULEVARD February 11, 1982 Council had before them an ordinance for consideration, ordering an election on April 3, 1982 relating to the completion of Mo-Pac Boulevard (Loop 1) from FM 1325 to Highway 290 west. Motion Councilmember Mullen made a motion to waive the requirement for three readings and finally pass an ordinance ordering an election on April 3, 1982 relating to the completion of Mo-Pac Boulevard with the ballot reading as follows: Should Mo-Pac Boulevard be completed from FM 1325 to Highway 290. Mayor McClellan seconded the motion. Mayor Pro Tem Trevino said the wording of the ballot is something that can be discussed next week. Councilmember Mullen said they can split the que Motion the question. The Council, on Councilmember Mullen's motion, Mayor McClellan's second, waived the requirement for three readings and finally passed an ordinance ordering an election on April 3, 1982 relating to the completion of Mo-Pac Boulevard. (7-0 Vote) Councilmember Mullen said he would like the wording on the ballot to be absolutely clear to the voters. Motion Councilmember Mullen made a motion, seconded by Mayor McClellan to include the following wording on the ballot: Should Mo-Pac Boulevard be completed from FM 1325 to U.S. Highway 290? Yes No Discussion followed concerning the wording of the petition. Mr. Robb Southerland discussed the petition which he had circulated and said they want to vote on the completion of MoPac at both ends. They do not want the wording on the ballot to say north end and south end, but completed at both ends. More discussion followed. Substitute Motion Councilmember Deuser made a substitute motion, seconded by Councilmember Urdy to delay a vote on the wording of the ballot for one week. Motion passed by a 5-2 vote. Mayor McClellan and Councilmember Mullen voted No. Mayor McClellan announced this issue will be scheduled for Thursday, February 17 at 5:00 p.m. Council Memo 12 FUTURE ENERGY NEEDS Motion February 11, 1982 The Council, on Councilmember Duncan's motion, Mayor McClellan's second, voted to direct the City Manager to direct staff to provide Council with new policy statement as to our alternatives and commitments with respect to immediate and long-range electric generation needs; and to begin preliminary discussions with LCRA staff related to our future energy needs. (6-0 Vote, Councilmember Goodman was out of the room.) This item was introduced to Council by Mayor McClellan. REVIEW OF BOARDS & COMMISSIONS RESCHEDULED Mayor McClellan suggested the rescheduling of annual review of Boards and Commissions for February 18, 1982 at 3:00p.m. Council agreed. REVIEW OF MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGES Mayor McClellan suggested the rescheduling of interviews of Municipal Court Judges previously scheduled for February 15, 1982 at 3:00p.m. to March 6, 1982 at 10:00 a.m..Council approved. ITEM POSTPONED An item introduced by Councilmember Goodman to consider authorizing authorizing the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees to participate in new employee: orientation programs for non civil service employees was postponed until next week. STNP PROJECT CONSTRUCTOR Mayor McClellan had introduced an item to Council to discuss the forthcoming South Texas Project Management Committee and Chief Executive Officer meetings related to the selection of a Project Constructor. They Mayor said that there were, as yet, no recommendations for Project Constructor.. WORK SESSION CANCELLED The Council, on Mayor Pro Tem Trevino's motion, Mayor McClellan's second, cancelled the work session concerning general aviation site needs which was scheduled for February 24, 1982. (6-0 Vote, Councilmember Goodman was out of the room.) Council Memo 13 SALE OF PROPERTY February 11, 1982 The Council, on Councilmember Deuser's motion, Mayor Pro Tem Trevino's second, approved sale of a parcel of City-owned real estate that has been declared surplus located at 801 West 29th Street. (6-0 Vote, Councilmember Goodman was out of the room.) Council had before it for consideration the sale of another parcel of property located at 709 West 29th Street. They will decide upon the sale next week. APPROACH MAIN The Council, on Councilmember Urdy's motion, Mayor McClellan's second, adopted a resolution approving a contract between the City of Austin and Milwood Joint Venture for consideration of an approach main and water improvements. (5-1 Vote, Councilmember Duncan voted No, Councilmember Goodman was out of the room.) ITEM POSTPONED Council postponed for one week consideration of adopting the Renewable Energy Development (RED) Plan. ZONINGS SET FOR PUBLIC HEARING The City Manager reported the following applications have been referred to the Planning Commission for recommendation and have been set for public hearing before the City Council on February 25, 1982. 1. C14r-81-224 PERRY INVESTMENTS, INC. FROM: Interim "A" Rest- dence, 1st H&A By: Donald E. Bird 3800 & 3900 blocks I.Η. 35 TO: (Far South Austin Community Assn.) FROM: 2. C14-81-234 JOE B. LEWELLEN 5710 Nancy Drive (Far South Austin Community Assn.) TO: (Pleasant Hill Neighborhood Assn.) 3. C14-81-235 CLEVE M. EARLEY "GR" General Retail, 2nd H&A "MH" Mobile Home, 1st H&A "AA" Residence, 1st H&A FROM: "A" Residence, 6715 Manchaca Road and 1920 Bissel Lane TO 1st H&A "0-1" Office, (Cherry Meadows Neighborhood Assn.) 1st H&A (Miles Avenue-Manchaca Estates Assn.) 4. C14-81-236 EULALIO HERNANDEZ, JR. 7812 Gault St. and FROM: "B" Residence, 1st H&A 1301-1303 Anderson Lane TO: (Crestview Neighborhood Assn.) "0" Office, 1st H&A 5. C14-81-237 COUNTRY GROCERY, INC. By: Jim Spence 11794 Jollyville Road also bounded by Sierra Navada (Northwest Oaks Neighborhood Assn.) 6. C14-81-238 LENA E. & ETTA I. DYESS By: Alan I. Castaneda FROM: "A" Residence, 1st H&A TO: "C" Commercial, 1st H&A FROM: "A" Residence, 1st H&A TO: "BB" Residence, 1st H&A 4712 Harmon Avenue (No formal Neighborhood Assn.) : 7. C14-81-239 BUCKINGHAM RIDGE DEVELOPERS and FROM: "LR" Local Retail, C.W. HETHERLY, JR. 1st H&A By: D. Edward Moore TO: "C" Commercial, 6532-6536 South Congress Ave. (Far South Austin Community Assn. (Pleasant Hill Neighborhood Assn.) 1st H&A 1:} 8. C14-81-240 DAVID B. BARROW, JR. By: Roe Gregg 3563 Far West Blvd., Suite 106 also bounded by Wood Hollow Dr. (Northwest Austin Civic Assn.) FROM: "GR" General Retail, 1st H&A TO: "C" Commercial, 1st H&A ZONINGS - (Continued) 9. C14-81-241 J. ALTON BAUERLE AND ROGER GAILLARDETZ By: William J. Scudder TO: 2601 Del Curto Road, access also to Southland Drive (No formal Neighborhood Assn.) FROM: "A" Residence, 1st H&A "A-2" Condominium, 1st H&A し 10. C14-81-242 AARON A. BUFORD By: M&B Plumbing Contractors, Inc. 12117 and 12119 Pecan St. (Northfield Homeowners Assn.) 11. C14r-81-243 LML INVESTMENT COMPANY By: Phil Mockford Rear of 12595-12601 Research also bounded by Oakmont St. (Northfield Homeowners Assn.) 12. C14-81-244 JAY L. JOHNSON, JR. By: Miguel "Mike" Guerrero 2910 Manchaca (No formal Neighborhood Assn.) 13. C14-81-245 MARY A. RAGLAND ET AL By: Jerry Saegert 3612-3618 S. 2nd Street 800-804 S. Center (South Austin Neighborhood Council) South Austin Multi-Purpose Center) 14. C14-81-246 REMEDIOS MERCADO By: W.L. Thompson, Jr. 2903 Swisher Street (Concordia Neighborhood Assn.) 15. C14-77-138 J. KIRK CANSLER By: Richard J. Ebert Rear of 10511-10621 N. Lamar (Northcreek Community Assn.) FROM: "A" Residence, TO: 1st H&A "GR" General Retail, 1st H&A FROM: Interim "AA" Res1- TO: dence, 1st H&A "C" Commercial, 1st H&A FROM: "A" Residence, TO: 1st H&A "GR" General Retail, 1st H&A FROM: "A" Residence, TO: 1st H&A "C" Commercial, 1st.H&A FROM: "A" Residence, 1st H&A "0" Office, TO: 4th H&A Amendment to Restrictive Covenant (Mockingbird Hill Neighborhood Assn.) 16. C7p-80-013 GENE TANKERSLEY 1201 Enfield Road (Concerned Citizens for the Development of West Austin) Amendment to Restrictive Covenant ZONINGS SET - (Continued) 17. C14-72-177 ABRAHAM P. YUJA By: John W. Whitaker, III 9086-9126 Old U.S. 183 (Balcones Civic Assn.) ADJOURNMENT Council adjourned its meeting at 11:45 p.m. Amendment to Restrictive Covenant